Thursday, April 26, 2007

So, here we are...

Go read this thread at WitchyWoo's. It is long, you have been warned.

This is my response to Stormy's "request".

Well, if this is where we are then this is where we are. I can either swear to never say nasty or critical word about radical feminism, or more specifically radical feminists, or even certain radical feminists, and comply with whatever other demands Stormy has now, or later, or whenever, or she will publish the information she has gathered on me for everyone to see, including part of my name, un-edited photos I had stored elsewhere for work reasons (images possibly triggering, contain identifying marks, which would, No Doubt, be used by her Without My Consent and without payment, and which she does not own), and whatever else she’s dug up. In short, she’s blackmailing me, and threatening doing what she can to out me, a tactic known as intimidation, which, if effective, would be coercive and silencing.

How does one respond to that, really? I could say, okay, fine, you win, but I never know when something I might say randomly might cross the line and void the deal. I could say that use of images owned by other people without their consent and really, for no educational purposes whatsoever is more than a little sketchy. I can’t obviously trust her to hold up her side of the bargain now, can I?

I can’t, because frankly, for all my alleged narcissism, sociopathy, so on, so forth, whatever other insults or mental illness’s you want to throw in my general direction, I can’t comprehend doing this to someone else, even if the information was already out there. A lot of information, from home addresses to credit card numbers can be found out there “in the public” domain. I don’t, for lack of a better word, believe in outing people, no matter how much I might dislike them…because those people usually have other people in their lives that I do not know, nor do I know how it would affect them. I’ve even blogged against it, actually. And I’ve never done it or threatened to do it to anyone here.

My violent statement was bad, I get that. Stormy, what you are doing here is a threat. I’ve said previously in this thread that I would lay off the bashing because I have been harsh, and often wrong, over-zealous, mean, vicious, whatever other term you want to use. I said there were three people who I specifically thought had been just as nasty myself. And I think they have. No one here has to agree…hell, I never demanded that anyone agree with me…but that is how I feel about it and what I think, not that it matters what I feel or think, or has it ever for the most part when it comes to this sort of thing, nor would it probably ever matter in the future either, because in the opinions of most folks here…I am the worst, the most guilty party, and one of you has decided these means are okay…and is prepared, rather gleefully, to publish and dig for more.

So now I have Stormy’s Ultimatum, threat, blackmail, coercive means to get me to shut up hanging over my head, right there, in black and white as it were. It’s obvious I can’t trust her. Having gone this far to stop me, I have no reason to think she’s a woman of her word. I am not even claiming the word feminist at this point, I really have no desire to use it, and for all my foul deeds, I’ve never attempted to harm someone by putting them in this position. I discussed the matter with people who do matter to me, people I trust; a good long time friend, the significant other, other folks who know me and how this sort of thing goes, even got a note or two from some decidedly neutral corners regarding the matter…and after the “crap, that is blackmail” sentiments were finished, the primary advice seemed to be… “Well Ren, you can never speak your mind, on anything, or allow you commenters to speak freely without worrying if this woman will be offended and go through with her threat or not, employ the same tactic on others, you can constantly be wondering about it, or you can do your thing, let her spill what she’s got, most of which, widely known or not, was public, even though she has no right or legal claim to display your photos, and see if she keeps digging, at which point, make it a legal issue,” or I could “just walk away”.

But I am not sure if I can just walk away at this point, hell, I am not sure if I can do either. I’ve never been big on threats, blackmail, and attempted silencing and intimidation to start with. I’ve never threatened to out someone in any way because it’s a rotten thing to do not just to the person, but the people in their lives as well, and I can never know when Stormy would just decide for one reason or another to do it anyway, and I cannot take or trust her at her word…not now, not any time ever again. How do I just walk away when at this point, no matter what she might say, I can never know what thing might be said, which will be attributed to me and an attack on “radical feminists” and she will do what I suspect she is planning on doing anyway? There are no assurances for me, whatsoever, that Stormy would keep up her side of the bargain. None at all.

I said I would lay off on bashing rad feminism and radical feminists, but if anything and everything I ever say is held to a standard of guilt or innocence by a woman who thinks this is all fine and dandy, I’d live in fear of ever offering my opinion again, and that is not fair, it is not right, no matter how much anyone disagrees or what nasty things they say.

I don’t think women, even me, should have to live under fear of a threat. You are making that happen, personally, right now.

So, I guess this is where I stand on the matter, because a lot of people are right and this has just gotten out of hand: I won’t personally say word one to or about another radical feminist blogger unless asked for my opinion or invited to comment in her space. If linked or quoted, I do think I have the right to give my side or defend myself. Large feminist/women’s issues, I do think I have a right to comment or write about them or critique/analyze them, but I will avoid bashing. Books and noted authors/speakers, I think I should be able to do the same, but I will avoid bashing them. I am not responsible for the attitudes and words of those who comment on my blog, those words and attitudes belong to them, and I have never claimed to run a women’s only/safe space. I have the right to talk about my job and defend my choice to do it. I also won’t delete anything I’ve said previously, because erasing it does nothing, but I will refrain from personal attacks/ the “bashing” of radical feminists in the future…because really, it gets us where? Here. I will, however, for the record, state that I disagree with the threat of outing anyone, because it causes them fear, and affects not only them, but other people in their lives. I can’t trust you to be a woman of your word, Stormy, none of “us” can. Would you like it if some men, who are often bashed on Radical Blogs, did something like this to you? If I, or someone from UK feminist circles or anywhere, did it to you? Would any of you? Point is, I suppose, I will refrain from “bashing”, but I am not going to let you silence me via threats and black mail, but I will do what I’ve said here and hope that I you honestly think about your tactics here and how you would like it if they were applied to you. I will also be posting this, and linking the thread…after all, everyone is standing by what they’ve said here, yes? I personally suspect you will go ahead and do it anyway, that other than stopping my blog and deleting the whole thing nothing would satisfy you (after all, you’ve been a bit vague about what exactly it is that you wanted.)

But if you back off, then, sure, I am done. I won’t be tearing any Radical Feminist up for their actions, even if it might be warranted. I will blog about Other Things. You will not see a “radical feminist/radical feminism” post out of me again. If those terms are agreeable to you, let me know. If not, let me know, and so be it.


After all, you have no real need to pay attention to anything that I say anyway, I am no longer claiming to be a feminist blogger.

96 comments:

Amber said...

This is bullshit that sinks to new depths of bullshittiness. I am blown away. Stormy is off her fucking head. Thank god she's on the other side of the Atlantic.

byrdeye said...

How dirty...

As I've said before - fems, esp radfems, are extremely Stalinesque in silencing dissent. Either by blocking comments or...blackmail.

I mean, your "e-threat" was obviously not a literal one - but they have deliberately misinterpreted it as one as an excuse to silence you.

This is why I believe freedom of thought and speech is so important for all. Because censorship of other people can eventually becomme censorship against you. And whatever people do to others, they will eventually do to you.

Andrea said...

Blackmail is illegal. Carries a fairly nasty jail term I believe. And she did it publically with hundreds of witnesses.

Stupid move.

Sassywho said...

Ren,

I applaud how you've handled this. I can't believe the audacity and complete lack of regard for women. Shame on them(hey it's still a little early, I'll have more venom later).

Renegade Evolution said...

hey all- as I promised, I will not be bashing any radical feminists.

I am thinking what information is known...well, stuff on my blog, obviously...stuff from my now defunt old LJ...

So yeah..

My middle name: Miriam
Hometown: Metro DC
College: Duke
Law School I want to go to: Georgetown
physchlogical diagnosis; Anti-social/ocd- some sociopathic tendancies
College Days NickName- ViolentJaye (as in, violent j from the insane clown posse)
Mr.E's middle name and occupation
number of siblings-1
place of birth: NY
blah blah blah...
and, of course photos with no editing where my face is clearly seen and tattoos are idenitfiable...the only thing that worries me in the least, really...aside from Mr.E's stuff, because this ain't about him.

I just feel like if I fully cave to this, tempting as it might be in some aspects, who says the tactic won't become common place?

Shrug. I've faced worse adversity in my life.

Anonymous said...

Talk about silencing.

I'm sorry that they've made you their latest victim.

I know these people and your information has already been passed around. It will pop up somewhere anyway. This is what they do.

Soulhuntre said...

Hey Ren,

It's pretty horrible what is being done here - and clearly you have to keep yoru own counsel on hwo to handle it.

I will simply point out that by 'promising' not to discuss or criticise these people you have handed this sick wierdo the moral jsutificationt hey need to release this information in the future.

In their minds, they have won. Put of fear you have 'promised' (in their minds) to allow them to attack, slander and continue to distort your postions and your whole life. They will do so with viscious intent until some day you comemnt and this idiot says "there you go! she broke her word!" and pulls the trigger.

Experience shows that the only way to survive dealign with terrorists (and these people are) is to absolutely not negotiate. No quarter.

My best advice (and its a horrible situation) is to realize that this person will release her information anyway and simply devlare that you will post exactlyw aht you wish, when you wish, about whome you wish.

Ken

DBB said...

Sickening. This is the use of threat of violence (and it IS violence, threating to give personal information about that) to silence a woman. And they call themselves feminists? If a man did it, he'd be called a mysoginist.

If you truly don't want to talk about rad fems anymore, that's your right, but it sickens me to see this. To me this crosses a line.

Stormy makes one wonder why you need the "patriarchy" to oppress women when radfems like her are so willing to do the oppressing all by themselves.

Amber said...

I know I sound like a broken record, but Jesus, it never stops being relevant...

So much for "caring about women."

So much for "hating the porn industry, not the women who work in it!"

And if I see one more radfem apologist say, oh nooooo, they're not attacking YOU, they're attacking the SYSTEM! You poor little thing, you just don't see the DIFFERENCE do you! You're attacking a STRAWFEMINIST! No one has ever attacked the ACTUAL WOMEN! Because we LOVE women!

...someone will get a boot to the face.

Amber said...

And who the fuck does Stormy think she is, to go around making demands? Fuck her right in the ear. I had a better conversation this morning w/ the birdshit on my car windshield.

rosarose said...

THIS IS COMPLETE SHIT, REN.

You won't talk mean about these fucking thugs anymore, but I sure will. They really have gone too far. Way too far.

If they think you we're bad. Wait, just wait.

Dig on me all you want, harpies, I don't have quite the dirt.


RosaRose

Anthony Kennerson said...

I just read the entire thread over at Witchy's (and made a snapshot copy for posterity, too).

As much as I would say that I'm stunned that they would stoop this low, I won't say it...because what Stormy's doing to you is exactly what Ann Bartow did to Bitch|Lab when B|L called her out on her crap.

And Chasingmoksha jumping in with the "poor pitiful me" song...as if she hasn't engaged in even more strident attacks on Ren and others.

This CULT -- and yes, Heart(less), Sam, Stormy, W-W, and you other APRF's, I am calling you out outright for what you are -- has intimidated and attempted to silence their critics for far too long...and the fact that you, Ren, are even thinking of backing away from criticizing them is a bad, bad sign that they are being successful.

Do what you have to to protect yourself and your privacy....but I'd rather stay and fight these fascist absexuals (how's that for a quote, Stormy??) and reveal them for what they really are.

Oh...but only respect for Ren's blog and the rest of the people here prevent me from really saying what I feel about these....ladies.

Fuck the lot of 'em. All of them.


Anthony

Deoridhe said...

This is... absolutely vile, especially in the wake of DeviousDiva's outing and the response to it on the part of many feminists.

OUTING PEOPLE IS ALWAYS WRONG.

belledame222 said...

yeah, I can't believe they're trying this right when...

say, "Take Back the Blog" is the 28th.

maybe some people could use a reminder that it ain't just creepy mens who make us feel unsafe;

sometimes creepy womens do it, too.

verte said...

This is fucking horrific. It was probably the same woman who started posting Graham's (from the incurablehippy thread on Ladyfest) address and phone number. You know, maybe, just maybe, they should think about what their words would sound like if they were being directed at THEM by a man.

I don't understand - do they think it's big and clever to treat other women like shit? Does it somehow make them feel validated to bully people? To 'name and shame'? Does that make them feel all empowered? Fuck off.

She's made an open threat right there and it's completely pathetic. Most of the radfems don't have the guts to post with their own names on sex-pos blogs.

And as for witchywoo's bullshit about not allowing ALL comments, maybe she should look at her friend Charliegrrl's blog where only comments that say 'I agree 100% Charliegrrl' are allowed through.

I'm so sorry these UK feminists are capable of such maliciousness. It's genuinely depressing.

Renegade Evolution said...

AK: For the record, to the best of my knowledge, Chasingmoksha has never attacked, or said much of anything to me really. Other than our recent discourse on WW's, she's not said much of anything, if anything, to me at all.

Amber said...

"Do not engage" is the wisest course of action, in my opinion (for me anyway). I mean just look - Lya Kahlo is back on the "oh some pornsick dudes said so and they're always right" trope again. What the fucking hell? Can she READ? Does she? 'Cause all evidence points to no.

Oh I also love (from various people), "I don't read many sex positive blogs, BUT..." - and here comes the sweeping generaization - "the few times I have, I've seen x y and z!"

Don't radfems get rightfully pissed off when people say the same thing about them? Substitute "radical feminist" for "sex positive" above. It doesn't matter, either way, it's stupid and small-minded.

Sassywho said...

while ideologically i disagree with most rad-fems, i thought it was pretty universal that threatening women is not ok.... and i suspect most of them agree with that. however, like i said in the other cases, to remain silent is to condone it.

so any rad-fem blogger who does not speak up and call stormy out for her actions as being vile and disturbing, well lets just ask the question again... who stole whose handbook?

Phlegmatic said...

Hey Ren, I have been lurking about here every once in a while, and I just wanted to say some of the things I have seen you write, and some of your views on things have given me a good deal of respect for you.

This is completely useless I know, especially since I am completely ignorant of your current situation. Still, this is me - a complete stranger, trying my best to be somewhat supportive. I know youll continue to handle this ugly situation just fine.

Deep Feminist said...

I did it. Here is why.

Andrea said...

Hm, I just read the beginning of that thread with all the talk of my super-dishonest dishonesty, and my answer to it, should you care to read it, is back on my place on the 'Clearing Up' post.

Renegade Evolution said...

DF: That was might brave of you. Thank you. Seriously.

kactus said...

well Ren, you know my feelings about this. I'll state them again--do not engage. I just don't see this as a fight that can be won by either side, especially when it's gotten to this point of escalation.

I don't know if it's possible for anybody to really listen right now. It's like real-life fights, starts off with words, then maybe a slap, then some fists flying, who knows when the guns are going to come out? I'd hate to see that.

I wonder if it's possible for a neutral third party to mediate this? Or if such a neutral third party even exists, probably not. In the absence of that, then, just get the fuck out of dodge.

I know that sounds wishy-washy. It's actually just the advice of somebody who's had to negotiate a lot of sticky territory over the years without losing her head or her sanity.

drakyn said...

I wonder if she gets the fact that she is threatening you? All blackmail is a threat. It isn't some magically legal and feminist way of getting someone to do what you want, it is a threat. "You do this or I will hurt you."
I also hope she doesn't bitch about you saying she is untrustworthy. After all, anyone who threatens you isn't trustworthy.

For what it is worth, I really hope you continue to blog. Your writing style is fun and your posts (even the ones that don't 'bash' radfems; omfg!) are always interesting and thought-provoking. Allowing people of all views to leave comments mens that there is a lot of really good discussion (as I'm sure you know). As other people have said in the comments of some of your other posts, even MRAs have made some intelligent and thought-provoking comments.

S: To any 'radfems' who read this: This is not bashing radfems. This is me stating facts about a specific woman's actions.

Renegade Evolution said...

kactus: I know, and thanks. The comment thread is huge, and part of me feels like MAYBE...is that...is that headway? But I don't know.

Amber said...

"untrustworthy"? Oh, that's the LEAST of what she is!

I've got some adjectives for her, if she needs something to bitch about...

Octogalore said...

Ren -- I don't think it's headway. I think it's the excitement of kids in high school when a crowd shouts "fight!"

I have to agree with soulhuntre. Negotiation's great when it's to reach a mutually productive outcome, not in response to a threat, and this is what's happening. None of the "justifications" warrant what's been dished out to you. You've been more than accommodating in response.

It's of course easy for others to say who aren't (yet) being targeted. But I love the uncompromising, honest nature of your blog and, selfishly, would be sorry to see that change.

Renegade Evolution said...

Octo:

After this, I have no desire to blog about Radical Feminism at all. Perhaps even feminism over all. My experiences with feminism, as a movement, overall, have not been great. I'm not going to stop blogging, I just won't be blogging about radical feminism.

Besides, I know y'all are itchin' to know how they fake those porn moneyshot scenes and stuff (humor, trying to maintain some humor).

Andrea said...

Well, for what it's worth, I'm sorry I wrote the post that facillitated this whole situation. It wasn't actually meant to start anything, and for the most part I only have a few regular commenters, so I was writing to them. But I'm sorry that you got the most fallout from it, Ren. Especially since you posted at WW's in defence of me.

It's not fair on you, and I'm sorry.

JackGoff said...

I'm tired of all of it.

Anthony Kennerson said...

Oh, now I see that CM has noticed my little response to their madness, and is now accusing me of the sin of trashing them as well.

I just wrote this to W-W's blog; I'm sure that it won't survive the filters; but it's my view anyway:

[post]
Now, I know that being the Porn-Loving Patriarch that I am (not really), that my views will probably not get through the filters imposed by W-W...but Chasingmoksha's mention of me is just too much to resist....so I will try my best.

Is it not enough for you that Ren has said openly and publically that she would stop "trashing" you and your sister ideologues, CM?? Or perhaps, only a full confession of her sins as a "sexbot" and a slut, followed by a ritual self-flagellation and a conversion to the Church of MacDworkinism will do for you?

And what I say at my blog or any other blog is MY words and MY words alone...I am paid by no one (except my current employer, and they don't really care about what I do when I'm off the clock.

And hell, yes, I am openly and unabashedly critical of what you so aptly call "radical feminism", because it has been proven time and time again to be nothing more than a Trojan horse for the most vile personal hatreds and loathing of women -- and feminists, too -- whose only crime is to not march in perfect goose step with your chosen ideology of sex-baiting and universal, collective guilt.

If you are going to quote my blog and my words, at least have the decency to smack me down in public rather than hiding behind a firewalled blog. But then again, decency hasn't been much of a presence here lately.

You made the wine, ladies...now you will drink the cup. You will be treated as you treat others.

Oh...and please, oh, for Goddess' sake, do please bring out all the "dirt" you can find on me you can. You may have intimidated Andrea and Ren to silence...but I believe in rapid response in kind when attacked....and I've survived much worse.

It is officially on, ladies. You want a reasoned debate, I'm right here. You want to go nuclear....well, I'm still here. Let's dance.

Anthony
[/end post]

Do what you have to do, Ren...but some of us aren't going away so quietly.


Anthony

Renegade Evolution said...

Andrea: You don't owe me an appolgy for anything. Seriously. This has all been very educational. no regrets, eh?

Central Content Publisher said...

But anti-porn/anti-prostitution/anti-BDSM feminists are not *anybody’s* oppressors. - womansspace

Except, you know, people who rely on porn, BDSM, and prostitution for a living. No, lobbying to remove someone's source of survival isn't oppressive - not when you prefix it with being a feminist [insert my eyes rolling all over the place].

What is, or what isn't feminist is irrelevant though. Feminism is nothing specific - a bunch of straw feminists claiming unity. It's a flag without substance.

The conflict (in this case) is really between puritanism and sexual freedom. On that front, no "headway" was made in that thread whatsoever. The only "headway" was that Radical Feminism was taken off the list of things that can be criticized. Which, considering it doesn't mean anything, isn't really a whole lot.

Unless... did someone actually define feminism while I wasn't looking?

Amber said...

Andrea and Ren - and, hell, everybody else - you should never apologize for speaking your mind. You did nothing wrong. Those crazy fucking assholes are the ones who have done wrong.

On a bit of a lighter note...

Besides, I know y'all are itchin' to know how they fake those porn moneyshot scenes and stuff (humor, trying to maintain some humor).

Yes, actually, I would like to know that!

Andrea said...

It's not been educational, it's been fucking shitty. And whether it's owed or not, I am sorry, because you defended me as a good friend and have had nothing but shit from it.

And I'm so fucking angry about it I could kill someone.

belledame222 said...

CCP: oh christ. you realize that that is the same person who claimed that women cannot oppress transfolk, which comes in awfully handy if you're actively supporting discriminatory laws as well as trying to smear and harass a transwoman that never did anything to you, simply because she dared to claim the identity of a feminist and a woman and imagery and suffering that Heart had fondly imagined to be the special province of radical feminism, or her own definition thereof, for some bizarre reason.

she's so full of shit she squeaks going into a turn...

Iamcuriousblue said...

I read through the postings at Witchy's – my God!

I've always thought the more hardcore radfems were basically petty vindictive would-be fascists, but this really takes it. Fucking blackmailing you to shut you up? Outrageous!

On one hand, I think its good of you to think in terms of de-escalating the personal aspects of this blog war. Its getting to be less about issues and more about who said what to whom. On the other hand, I can see where its relevant to discuss behavior, since so much of the behavior of the radfem blogosphere is deeply creepy and cultlike and really says something about the underlying ideology.

I don't know what it is Stormy is holding over you, but I just hope this doesn't scare you off all criticism of radical feminism, anti-porn, or whatever. I really think that's what Stormy wants when she says she wants you to stop "bashing" radfems. Any ideology is a valid target of criticism and outright opposition and they have no fucking right to stop you from taking that stance through threats.

What particularly galls me is that they now not only want apologies out of not just you, but anybody here who has allied with you. Which they're not going to get – if I have any response, its to give them the very opposite of an apology, and I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that.

It also seems like they want you to give up the name of the person who forwarded the Genderberg comments. I hope you're not seriously considering caving on that point. Whoever did that, I think keeping their trust is more important than earning temporary letup from a bunch of shits.

Andrea said...

No silence, I absolutely stand by my opinions on the matter. I just feel bad for Ren is all.

Renegade Evolution said...

Andrea: Really, don't be. I was nervous there for awhile about what she had to show the world. Truth is, if it was already out there, it was already out there. Shrug. Not fearing it is actually much better. So, that is dealt with. And I do intend to stick by what I said I would do. That's not so hard either.

IACB: I agreed not to bash and basically ignore rad fems. I can do that. Don't, for a second, fear my views have changed about porn... :)

Andrea said...

I'm also sorry I ever aligned myself with such people. I don't know if I had shit in my eyes obscuring my vision or what. I think I thought they were different.

belledame222 said...

yeah, i'm for a massive "ignore" fest, barring instances where they actually affect reality (i.e. Leeds, influencing law as per the UK or anywhere they join up with the RR).

if you want to win friends and influence people, you (one) needs reach out to -other- people. people who're already sympathetic, and people who are Just Folks. address them. reframe it on your own terms.

that's what i plan on doing.

belledame222 said...

...stalking, i should say, also counts as "real," as do threats of outing and other forms of harassment.

that though is about a deranged...um, behavior.

that she's apparently using it to prop up/defend an ideology, and that apparently none of those who share that ideology are stepping up to the plate to say, "hey, that's fucked up," well...that's a great little P.R. move, but it ain't your problem, and it ain't mine either.

Andrea said...

Yup, ignore fest.

Much like, say, you don't reward a naughty dog for its bad behaviour.

Nanette said...

I've been going back and forth trying to figure out what to say about all this. I had a really, really bad "first impression" of radical feminism because of all the transhate at twisty's and Heart's blogs and I'm afraid that, despite my best efforts, that has colored my view of radfems ever since.

Also, in many ways, I'm about as milquetoast as you can get... I am not at all "kinky", don't do bdsm (and have no real understanding of the attraction), don't have anything to do with porn - although I do have an opinion on the rights of sex-workers of all sorts to be free from coercion and, ideally, from being forced underground and into marginalized areas due to laws that target and punish the wrong people - all that within the human rights framework, but I am not a sexworker activist or anything.

Anyway, all that is just to lay out my biases... because, regardless of where I stand on any of the related issues, I cannot imagine in what universe this is okay. A blatant blackmailing threat of "either you do this and accede to my wishes, or I will do this to harm you" is pretty freaky.

Granted, everything stormy has is apparently available through your blog (or other blogs or something), to anyone with curiosity and/or intent, so some can (and probably will) say that you "outed yourself" and, in a sense, they would be correct.

However, as far as I am concerned that has no bearing at all on the threats, both implied and overt, of intentionally and purposefully attempting to do you harm if you do not cease to speak of certain issues or bloggers and, it appears, restrain your commenters from doing so as well.

That is not only completely unacceptable, but also incredibly stupid, if the goal is to convince people to stop talking about or dissecting rad feminism in general, and specific rad fem bloggers in particular.

Andrea said...

Rosa> Have I told you lately you kick ass?!

Soulhuntre said...

The proposed "great wall" is a lie... and I think all concerned know it is. They obviously won't let me comment over there, so I'll say it here.

They will begin violating it the moment you agree. They already have. Stormy is so please with herself she can't contain it.

"I am sorry that I had to use such lowly tactics in order for you to change your ways, I am certainly ‘not proud’. However, nothing else has worked in the past."

And there you have the whole momentum behind why these people do what they do. Their status as eternal victims grants them moral sanction to do ANYTHING AT ALL to achieve their end and then deny any responsibility.

Poor Stormy, forced into blackmailing someone.

Your promise not to discuss them is a bad one Ren, though I can understand why you might have made it. It is clear you have the integrity to keep that promise - they do not.

So you will be the only person without weapons. They will continue to attack you, and you will be limited. You cannot even in their eyes really succeed anyway. Anything you say that is "pro" porn they consider a direct threat and an insult. Even if you said nothing but positive things about your life - they will feel attacked.

Someday, Stormy will decide that the only way to keep you down is to try and drive you off the net, then despite how magnanimous she is being in 'victory' she will out you.

Having seen this tactic work the others will look for similar 'dirt' on anyone else they disagree with. All the while telling their victims that they (the victims) forced them to do this.

Just like the abusers and rapists they claim to be fighting... they will tell you all the while that it's your fault.

anna louise said...

What a load of shit.
I know you're officially an ex-pat and that fights over definitions are boring as fuck but I think you fit into 'feminist' better than the kind of women who treat other women with such contempt.
I can't tell you want to do or tell you not to step back from a internet fight that is harming your non-internet life but it is fucked-up beyond belief the strategies these women (who are supposedly so concerned with the rights of women in the sex industry) to silence a sex worker because she doesn't toe their line.

Rootietoot said...

please, may I be on your side of the courtroom?
And, while I am fully aware that you are quite capable of handling yourself and events, I am sorry it is happening to you.

Renegade Evolution said...

soulhuntre;

Um, sorry, i like the porn and will continue to talk about it, and my job, and all that other stuff. That's not bashing anyone, and if at some point, it is deemed bashing, well, burn that bridge when we get to it. I'm past, honestly, carring about getting outed personally. I simply do not like the tactic, and frankly, I am sick of the bullshit back and forth too...seems like a fair amount of people are, on both sides.

And I don't see myself leaving the net anytime soon. Fear not.

Sassywho said...

nanette, sincerely thank you for you comment.

one thing i think is worth pointing out, think of how many rad-fems are questioning their association with the contradiction present in stormy's threat?

ren is right, it has been educational, and not just for her, but quite possibly for many women who may question the methods of that faction.

(why is it they have so many more creative names for us... sparkle ponies, tee hee princess and such? yet for the most part we refer to them as rad-fem?)

am i a bodyfascist? said...

though i'm aware it might be easy saying so from the 'outside': am afraid i'm really with amber re: 'you should never apologize for speaking your mind' -- so was really sorry to read you'd compromise in any way.

this'll just make them the winners and also sanctify their methods. pity, pity, pity.

eg. keeping some sense for tact and politeness (frankly sth that wouldn't harm you and plenty others wasting some more energy on here n there, but that's just mho) would be something else again.

for what it's worth me urging you, plz reconsider.

and yeah, my usual broken record: as long as my perception is that the bullies and narrowminded + selfrighteous wannabe goebbelses, shamers, blackmailers etc. are the majority + in charge on both sides, will firmly stick to

'neither mra nor pro-feminist'

though i do have respect for plenty views and individuals on both sides.

besides, hope your allergies will be treatable. and though i know this is different: went paying for a 'blood donation' myself recently, and all i can say is 'negative is positive' :-)

apostate said...

Crazy, weird, insane, completely horrible.

Ren, I can't see what you've done or said that could piss any rational person off, let alone be deserving of such vile threats. This is way out of line.

They deserved a simple 'fuck you.'

Crazy, crazy, crazy. 'Feminists.' Can't fucking believe it.

Anonymous said...

hey, I used to post here a bit, but kind of got tired of the politics and crap of the blogosphere. It was bad...this is just spectacularly fucked up.

williamx said...

Hi RenEv, I've said before and will say again
you rock.
This current brouhaha is something else. I sort of wonder: wtf?
It's possibly not an endoresment for me to say I enjoy the hell out of this blog. You have a refreshing, seemingly humanist attitude, despite the fact that people, in general, suck.
I kinds of wonder when does disagreement become bashing?
bah. now where do I go to now and again get some radfem critique that isn't completely lame and painful to read?
Also, anyone who thinks the world would be better or really in any way essential different if women where 'in charge' or if the partriarchy suddenly vanished would do well to familiarize themselves with this sordid round of internets drama.
And I find that, for some reason, extremely depressing.

Infra said...

It's eerie how familiar these tactics are to me, point for point, like clockwork. I've been subject to ones like them for quite some time, from someone who raised me, and they are familiar to me as my own skin. If, as it seems, they are rooted in the same kind of personalities, there is only one way I know to deal with them: make sure they have no leverage, and make no concessions. All else fails.

I learned this in blood over a period of three decades, trying the civil options as long as I could hold out. It drove me into the dust; but I suspect that you are stronger.

For what it's worth, whatever you decide and however you choose to abide: you have my sincere respect.

If nothing else, this, and all that led up to it, has established your place in the lives you've touched as someone of marked endurance and courage, and has shone a light on something dark and hidden, engraving in memory something that will not quickly fade. I can think of few things that would testify more strongly to someone's worth and quality as a human being.

Vanessa said...

Ren - anytime I've posted here it's pretty much been just to say "You're amazing," and I say it again now.

As for an ignore-fest, I've been doing that for awhile now. Who is this Store-mee or this Twee-stee of which you speak?

bint alshamsa said...

Ren, I am absolutely furious about this. I understand why you may want to ignore these assholes and I totally support whatever stance you want to take but I for one am not going to back down.

They have done their causes more harm than they can even imagine and I'm going to raise as much a stink about this as possible. They too have public information available and if they are not willing to put their homegirl in check, then perhaps someone needs to give them a good reason to.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

belledame222 said...

think of how many rad-fems are questioning their association with the contradiction present in stormy's threat?

dunno, but a few were sufficiently embarassed over the "bees and wasps" (btw, if you recall, that was when she tried similar shit with AP, telling her to remove her entire blog) shite to publically dissociate themselves, and others that didn't go that far did say something.

yeah, i do have something to say about this. that is -some- little P.R. y'all have got there.

"Stop saying mean things about our tactics for making women and especially sex workers safer, sex worker woman, or I'll OUT you!"

...k.

belledame222 said...


Granted, everything stormy has is apparently available through your blog (or other blogs or something), to anyone with curiosity and/or intent,


She's also not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

as you say, though, that's not really the issue here. That she thinks this sort of ultimatum is a good thing to do as retalitation for -talking smack,- and particularly for talking smack about "radical feminism," as though the ideology were personified now--that's seriously fucked up. What legit movement does this? And what sort of people who want to be considered legit allow people like this to speak for them without saying anything?

...you know, somewhere, possibly Heart talking about the Code Pink people and how depressing it was that women felt the need to be all girly and feminine to get work done (that's right, and some actual Code Pink women showed up and politely defended themselves. she was al sweety sweety of course. she's such an asshole). anyway i think i remember SC talking about how she tries to get her real-life group to all dress the same (apparently it's not a popular notion); i am trying to remember if she indeed said she wanted them to all wear black shirts.

anyway, it'd be...appropriate.

or brown. brown's nice, too. very Serious, are brown shirts and black shirts, especially worn as a uniform. yes.

belledame222 said...

SW: there have been names that they don't like. "Dworkinite," or "MacDworkinite," for instance.

the other names i have, well...what -do- you call this, after all? Fundamentalist feminism? "On Crack" feminism? Saint Loony Up the Cream Bun With Jam Feminism? We're Doing This For Your Own Good Feminism? Stone the Sluts Feminism?...

prosphoros said...

I don't know that I've ever commented here before, though I've been a regular reader for some time (by way of belle's blog, if I recall correctly). I think a show of support is important, though, so this is me, saying what Stormy did is wrong beyond wrong, and in no way that I can possibly understand is it "feminist".

Alphalpha said...

Why doesn't someone out Stormy, then?

Eye for an eye?

Amber said...

Rosa I tried to comment on your blog but kept getting errors. Anyway, just wanted to say: you rock, hardcore.

Renegade Evolution said...

AA: I don't advocate that on anyone.

Alphalpha said...

Sometimes people need to taste their own medicine to stop doling it out to others...

I mean, to simply cave in to her blackmail is enabling her and she may do it to others again, since it obviously works. And this is how evil wins over good.

I know you're not that type and neither am I, but fair would be fair in this case.

Renegade Evolution said...

Heya All-

Thanks for the well wishes, concern, so on, so forth, I am not good at this shit, but thanks.

And Belle, what, we don't get uniforms? Maybe something in a deep red, with GREAT boots???

Y'all realize this means I am gonna have to talk about porn and politics more now, right? Meybee cosmetic surgery? Football? AND SHOES!!!

Oh yeah, and more recipes. Lot's more recipes. And porn.

Well..it is me...I do likes my food and porn.

bint alshamsa said...

Belle:

"Dworks" seems pretty nice to me. You know, what's really funny to me, one of them just put a post on their blog with enough information on it for someone with the same mentality as Storm to go out and stalk them and their family if they were so inclined.

Now, I'm not the sort of person who would do that but it would be a shame if it did happen. I mean, have these people never heard of karma?

bint alshamsa said...

alphalpha,

I agree with you. Fair is fair. Unfortunately, it seems that these idiots didn't think this through very carefully before they decided to support Stalker-Storm.

belledame222 said...

I mean, at least when Bartow pulled this crap on zuzu and BL she was operating under the confidence of already being "out" under her own name...as a tenured professor.

in both cases though it seems to me that the stalker is actually more terrified than the stalkee. god knows of what. some nameless shit, i think, that goes beyond the real threat any nutjob with an Agenda and a home address poses.

back to the thund'rous one, though: besides everything else? kind of not the sharpest tool in the shed. that goes for a number of others in there as well.

"She's not playing with a full deck. She doesn't have a deck. She has a three."

It is true that what they lack in smarts they make up in lack of integrity, but being a Total Asshole with no redeeming features really only gets you so far, unless your name is Bush or something.

and even then.

belledame222 said...

Ren--why not say hello at rootie's and AP's joint cooking blog?

Iamcuriousblue said...

Re: outing Stormy

In the end, two wrongs don't make it right, and I wouldn't feel too good about posting Stormy's personal info, even if I could find it. I do think a case could be made for a very limited kind of counter-outing, for example, if somebody had that information on Stormy, I totally think it should be shared with Ren (or anybody else directly threatened by this person). But putting the info out there for just anybody – that would be stooping to their level.

"anyway i think i remember SC talking about how she tries to get her real-life group to all dress the same"

Egads – it sounds like this person saw Oleanna and actually thought it offered a good blueprint for "the movement".

belledame222 said...

"Fatal Attraction" is more like it.

"Oleanna" was shite, i once wrote a short parody called "Oleaginous," dunno what became of it though

bint alshamsa said...

iamcuriousblue,

In the end, two wrongs don't make it right, and I wouldn't feel too good about posting Stormy's personal info

Well, I certainly think that you should follow your conscience in this matter. At the same time, I can't say that it would make me feel bad if someone were to post Stalker-Storm's personal info.

"I don't think anyone would deny that when you send chickens out from the barnyard those chickens will return to your barnyard, not your neighbor's. It's an example of the devil's chickens coming home to roost...this same violence has claimed one of their own. Being a farm boy, chickens coming home to roost never made me sad. In fact, it's only made me glad."
-Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"

belledame222 said...

anyway i agree, turnabout isn't fair play in this case, and anyway would just keep escalating it.

anyway, i doubt there's anything terribly interesting to uncover there really. some beetle-browed troglodyte cowering in a tinfoil-coated room somewhere, surrounded on all sides by stacks of yellowing, dogeared pamphlets, tracts, half-finished anonymous letters to Enemies, and file folders full ever-so-carefully cataloged pr0n. what's to know.

belledame222 said...

Bint: my own personal motto:

"I do not believe I am a vindictive [person]; but when the immortal gods take a hand in the matter it is pardonable to observe the result with satisfaction."

She'll get hers. One way or another. I mean, seriously, with interpersonal skills like this, can you imagine how she gets by in her daily life?

she's probably the sort of person who picks endless feuds with the neighbor and the kid at the corner deli and that woman at the park who always looks at her funny and...

Cassandra Says said...

I'm having a really hard time seeing how Stormy, Pony etc can possibly imagine that what they're doing is helpful to the feminist cause in any way.
There are certain lines one simply does not cross if one is a decent, honorable human being. Blackmail is one of them.
If nothing else I have to wonder about all the silent watchers, the 75%+ who read blogs and never comment. What are they thinking about all this? If you (hypothetical you) were a young feminist just reaching out into the blogosphere, what impression of radical feminism would you take away from that discussion?

Sorry you're being put through this shit, Ren. What with this plus the allergies plus the parents being in town it must have been one hell of a week so far.

bint alshamsa said...

belledame,

I love ya' to death but I'm just not feeling this "ignore them and they'll fade away" idea. I just haven't found it to be true in real life--in my real life, that is. To me, it's not about whether there is anything interesting to be found in these people's personal information. It's about whether they should be allowed to bully others and still think that their personal lives will remain private and safe.

They are opportunists. They--and it is a group action because they are supporting Storm--are doing this to Ren because she has a life that is probably more "public" than the average person. It was easy for them to find info on her so now they are using the threat of outing her in an attempt to silence all dissent among those who even comment on Ren's blog.

To me, that means we are all being threatened. And counting myself among those who are being so threatened, I see this as a threat that should not go unanswered. I grew up in a cult. A real bona fide cult. I know what it is like to have people use the threat of punishing one's family and loved ones in order to exert control over others.

They keep talking about triggering. Well I'm feeling triggered as fuck! And I'm just not feeling inclined to just sit idly by and watch this all happen.

rosarose said...

I honestly hope the blackmailing stain outs her, or has already done so and Ren finds out, or "violates" the "treaty" or some stupid shit. What she did was wrong. And sure enough, another Rad Fem Ren has been civil with who has linked her more than a few time is having great fun portraying them as great heroes and Ren as a whiny bitch. Great guys! Thanks to Stormy's threat Ren probably does not even get to defend herself or remind ALL OF YOU ASSHOLES that whether or not her info was out there, her photos are HERS and should not be reproduced or passed around without her consent (why does this sound SO familiar?) and STORMY FLAT OUT THREATENED TO "DIG DEEPER" if she had too. Dig to what? Her home address? Her phone number? Her credit card number? Info on her family and boyfriend?

Really, I wish she (Ren) would just cut loose with what she really thinks about all this, and fight back, just as ugly and wrong as Stormy did (which would be justified and they accuse her of it all the time anyway).

Oh, by the way, Stormy, you're a piece of shit ad fuck you. Bad Karma? Has your name as a slogan on it!

Renegade Evolution said...

For the record, why yes, having been outed and having my life AND THAT of my family splattered out for people to see TWICE previously I am, in fact, feeling "triggered". That's not bashing, that is plain old fucking truth.

belledame222 said...

BA: let me be clear. I am NOT advocating ignoring the threat crap. And I'm not ignoring it.

What i WOULD like very much is for people to stop going, "hey, didja see what Twisty/Heart/some other fuckwit said THIS time??" because, again, barring any sort of actual threat or direct attack on someone (yes i included the Little Light transphobia in that category, that was ghastly), it's the SAME GODDAM THING THEY KEEP SAYING OVER AND OVER AND FUCKING OVER AGAIN.

and i know, look, i've been sucked into it as well. partly enjoy the flame war, partly stop and gawk at the trainwreck. hell, i'm doing it right now.

but. BUT. they are NOT THAT INTERESTING. and, particularly, i am tired of them framing the debate. they say something stupid as shit, we react defensively. why even use their terminology? how many times do we have to try to wrangle with people who do not or cannot seem to understand that no, actually, not everyone experiences the "patriarchy" the same exact fucking way?

i mean, so apparently Twisty made yet another stupid as shit post about BDSM. i am not reading it. i am not responding to it. soon however i will be posting on the subject according to how -i- experience and understand it. which, i was planning to do for a while now, even -without- input from or about Annoying Single-Track Blatherers. it speaks for itself. yeah?

that said, i will be making a Statement on all this.

on Saturday, I think. it's a good day for it.

belledame222 said...

...in a way, it's sort of the same problem as i think the left/Democrats/what you will have been having. on the one hand, you can't "just ignore" the Right, especially when they dominate (and are acting like crazed rabid weasels to boot); on the other hand, you can't -reason- with them (see "crazed rabid weasels," above) and you also don't want to let them take up more rent-free space in your head than they've already done. More to the point, you don't want to keep the setup where they frame the terms of the debate and you're simply fighting them on their terms.

bint alshamsa said...

Belledame,

okay, I understand what you're saying, I think. When I wrote about Heartless and ChasingImperialism a couple of months ago, I said what I wanted to say about their bigotry and I had a few laughs at their expense. Okay, it was a lot of laughs, but the point is that I really didn't have any plans on writing about anything else they said on their blogs. I mean, let's face it. They aren't even clever bigots, so there really wasn't anything they said that seemed worthy of having me mention on my own blog.

Back then I said on my own blog that I was adding them to the list of folks whose blogs I would not be visiting. On my blog-reader I have over forty blogs, blogs that think everyone should be reading, and I never get around to even keeping track of what's written on them. So, unless you're just the cat's pajamas in my eyes, I'm not going to waste my time reading your shit. Know what I mean?

So, I guess that's just the long way of saying that I agree with your suggestion about not giving the idiot theatre the benefit of a front page review by blogging about their latest posts.

At the same time, I put this blackmail situation in a different category and, like you, I am also going to do something about it. ;)

belledame222 said...

anyway, Bint, I don't mean to be flip, and i take what you're saying seriously as well. and yep, there are definitely cultlike vibes here, no doubt.

I guess the question is: does the fact that they or rather SC thinks she's "won" actually mean anything? Because, Ren's made it pretty clear by now i think that she's mainly just sick to death of the whole fucking thing, and has reserved for herself the right to do whatever she needs to do should thingie or her cohorts continue to escalate anyway.

speaking strictly for myself, (admittedly with less volatile material on myself Out There than Ren)--so far, their efforts to intimidate or control have irrestibly brought the phrase "like being savaged by a dead sheep" to mind. there are plenty of nutters out there already, some of them probably a lot less inept than this lot. i'm well aware of it. i'm still not losing any sleep over these twits, personally.

and really, it ought to go without saying that -anyone- who's posting anonymously can be tracked down and "outed;" the smart thing to do would be to just not even start it. then again, it is true that no one ever accused this lot of having the collective wit of a sparrow; still, spelling it out -to them- has never seemed to make much impact in the past, so...

i don't believe in pre-emptively full-on outing someone for threats, or returning threats with threats. the former because it's unethical as well as escalating, the latter because...it should go without saying. as far as i'm concerned, it does.

as the apocryphal 70 year old woman said to the patronizing dentist, his nutsack gripped lightly by one age-spotted but still firm hand:

"We're not going to hurt each other, are we, Doctor?"

and i do agree with Sylvia when she posted about this wrt the Sierra case. (too tired to go hunt up link or finish that thought)

and of course, if somehow Ren's (or anyone's) real name "somehow" gets leaked, well, gee, guess who's going to get suspected first? Even if she -didn't- do it? Ain't that a shame.

bint alshamsa said...

I think you're right. They can't be reasoned with. Growing up as the child of a guy whose greatest joy in life was teaching logic to college students, rational arguments were de rigeur if you wanted to convince him of anything. It used to disappoint me when I found people who not only had no clue how to reason well but also had no desire to engage in logical thinking.

Nowadays I know that there are many people who can only be dealt with by showing them that they too are vulnerable. Generally, I would say that people shouldn't berate someone because they have a drug addiction. However, I think that even the universe/God/Creator would make an exception to that rule when it comes to Rush Limbaugh. Goodnes knows, I'd rather we had a world full of Russ Feingold's and no Limbaugh's but, seeing as that ain't the case, we need someone to deal with the latter group.

God bless the pacifists but I don't think I'll ever be among that lot! I'm really glad that there are folks like iamcuriousblue and Ren, the folks who really may not have the stomach to get down and dirty with folks like Stormy et al but as for me--

I enjoy the feeling of mud on my toes.

Saorla said...

Ren, I'm generally a lurker. I prefer to little before talking. But I want to let you know that you rock. I love reading your writing.

I find what's happening to you appalling. Blackmail is despicable. Any theory or ideology should be fair game for discussion and disagreement is not bashing.

I look forward to reading more of your stuff!

Alphalpha said...

I personally don't give a fawk who Stormy is in real life - I don't have the time nor interest to dig into peoples' personal lives here. But my point is simply that people don't really know how shitty their own medicine tastes until they have to taste it themselves. The only point of exposing her would be to teach her this lesson.

You don't know how bullying hurts until you've been bullied yourself.

You don't know how censorship sucks until you've been censored yourself.

Etc etc..

You can tell people to stop doing these things on principle...but they probably won't until one day they find themselves on the other end of that stick themselves.

bint alshamsa said...

Belledame,

if somehow Ren's (or anyone's) real name "somehow" gets leaked, well, gee, guess who's going to get suspected first? Even if she -didn't- do it? Ain't that a shame.

Indeed, it would be a shame if that happens. Even those who don't believe in "pre-emptive strikes" would no longer have any reason to refrain from using the information about them and their loved ones (that is already available online) to show them what it feels like to have more of their lives on display than they ever intended others to see.

Dan L-K said...

"I am sorry that I had to use such lowly tactics in order for you to change your ways, I am certainly ‘not proud’. However, nothing else has worked in the past."

Oh. My. Elephant-headed. God.

Shorter Stormy: "Why do you make me hit you, baby? I wouldn't have to if you'd just act right."

belledame222 said...

When I wrote about Heartless and ChasingImperialism a couple of months ago, I said what I wanted to say about their bigotry and I had a few laughs at their expense.

Oh, yeah, I think you put in about the right amount of energy. point, laugh, move on.

thinking girl said...

Ren:

first, sorry I didn't read about this sooner, and I didn't read any but the first 10 or so comments on this thread.

I am so sorry about this. Outing is not right, not fair, a dirty, dirty, evil trick.

I'm glad you've chosen not to be silenced by this threat.

Stormy, shame on you.

belledame222 said...

as for not getting down and dirty--oh, i think Ren's got plenty of stomach, you know. Sooner or later though there does come a question of how much energy you want to put into a sorry little sparrowfart like this. especially when we've already been around and around and fucking AROUND this particular merry go round...

bint alshamsa said...

Ren, you can erase this if you want. I'll understand if you do and why.

Belle, ignoring the wannabe "race traitors" is easy but with regards to Stormy, I just left this comment over at witchy-woo's thread:

V,

unlike you, ive actually been in a fight or a hundred. ill tear your fucking head off. you want to go roung pretending like youre so fucking hard, little princess? bring it on. any fucking time.

I’m your huckleberry, sweetheart. If you want someone to go head to head with, I’m always available. Forget Andrea. If you’re itching for it, bring it this way.

I’ve tried to stay out of this conversation but I see that all this has done is give the rad-fascists here the impression that they may actually benefit from supporting those who would out a woman’s identity in order to blackmail her into obedience. Can anything scream “abusive spouse-mentality” any more than that?

So here it is, if it’s good for the goose it’s good for the gander too. If anyone happens to reveal Ren’s personal information, for any reason, you need to know that everyone in this thread’s radfem posse who has condoned or outright supported Stormy’s actions is, in my book, fair game for outing as well.

Now, if you’d like for your blogs to remain places where you can feel free to talk about the place where you work, your cute little offspring, your favorite local coffeeshop, et cetera, then you may want to think a bit more carefully about joining Stormy’s “camp” where outing women is considered an acceptable tactic. After all, if “ONE act, ONE threat” isn’t all that bad, then maybe more people will join in on the fun.

How will things look to you when you are the subject of the same sort of “ONE act, ONE threat”?


She may not publish it but that won't change the fact that notice has been served and they'll find out when they see it here or when they see their personal information plastered around the web and beyond. They can thank their buddy Stormy for inspiring all of us folks who were "fence-sitting" up until now.

JackGoff said...

Well, I think what we can glean from this is to never speak on any subject Stormy does not wish us to. I sincerely hope, Stormy, that if I ever put up something you do not like, you'll make it known that you disapprove. I blog under my name, but outing my family members and my girlfriend is not something I wish to ever have happen. I do not wish to endanger them, so I hope that my blog activities meet the Stormy Standard after today. This is the last time I'm ever going to speak on radical feminism. I don't feel safe doing so any more.

belledame222 said...

I make no promises about what i will or won't ever post on, certainly not a -subject- like an entire school of feminism. and i don't give a wet fart about "Stormy." if people wish to make their chosen branch of feminism look even less credible by allowing this sort of behavior to represent it, that is their problem. mostly, I'm just at the point where oh my GOD i am SO AGGRESSIVELY BORED by this bullshit and these PEOPLE...

Renegade Evolution said...

Bint:

In spirit, I so feel ya, but even if I get outed, I don't believe in doing it. That thread continues, I've really had it. I am not going to sit around and be blamed for, accused of shit I did not do, continue to get lied about and insulted, and say nothing about it...especially under threat. They want me to leave them alone and not say shit, fine, but that NEEDS to be a two way street, those willing to walk it, fine, parting of the ways they cease to exist to me, and vice versa I presume....but be everybody elses sitting duck/blame target/ verbal punching bag? No. I will not. And if she wants to make good on her threat because of that, so be it. But that tactic? Having been there, sitting there again right now? It's just wrong. Tempting, but wrong.

Renegade Evolution said...

what is ticking around in my mind at the moment, wrt my admittedly ill-advised 'choke' comment is...

well...it was not directed at any one person directly, even any one group of people. It was a gut rage lash out at people treating other folk i like very shitty...not just rad fems, but racists, sexists, utlra right wingers, religious zealots, mra's, trolls and random assholes....I mean, look at the list of people there in that post...they've taken shit from A LOT of people...of ALL kinds...

shrug.