Wednesday, November 05, 2008

An open letter to those who voted no on Prop K:

I don’t live in San Francisco. I don’t even live in California. I live in one of those traditionally, until last eve, red states. Republican, moral right, conservative red. I also happen to be a sex worker. Now, where I live? Something even like Prop K on a ballot? Well, that’s like a kid who has long since known the myths of childhood still believing in the tooth fairy. I’d expect a Prop K on my ballot the same way I’d expect a couple bucks under my pillow for a lost molar at age 40. However, even seeing a Prop K? Anywhere? Well, that made me want to believe. It gave me, and countless other sex workers out there, in and out of San Francisco, some sort of hope. It gave us this crazy idea that maybe, just maybe, we counted as humans to the rest of you, that we mattered, even just a little bit, to the rest of you.

Those of you who voted no, and those of you who campaigned for others to vote no, and those of you who claim to care about us, make book deals and educational credentials off of us and convinced others to vote no…well, you’ve proven that hope was ill-fated and you do not care, and that no matter what we, actual sex workers, say or do or plead for, we don’t matter, not even a little bit, to you. We don’t count as humans the way you do.

Prop K did not make trafficking legal. Prop K did not make the sexual abuse, rape, or exploitation of minors legal. Those things are and would have remained illegal. Prop K would not have ended sex worker outreach or exit programs. Yet those were the arguments you used to shoot down Prop K. You worried about your precious neighborhoods, which apparently mean more to you than the lives of sex workers and prostituted people. You used the lives and stories of the very people you then threw to the lions to make your case and defeat something that would have meant so much to all of us, even those of us who live in places where things like Prop K are just a fanciful dream.

And what has your no vote done? Well, people: women, men, boys, girls, of all colors, of all sexual orientations, of all ages, cis and transgender, will still be involved in prostitution. In homes, in hotels, in cars, in massage parlors, in alleys, in clubs, everywhere. The sex trade will continue on, just as it always has. Whether there by choice, or by force, or because there are no other options, people of all kinds will still be selling sex, and people will still be buying it. You know it, and I know it. However, thanks to you, when a young woman is raped, when a young man is beaten, when any of these people get cut up, sodomized, violated, abused, mutilated, harassed, tortured or robbed, they will still have no where to go. They will still fear the law; they will still carry, along with the stigma of being a whore, the stigma of being a criminal. Their murders will still be written up with the tag NHI (No Humans Involved). You have not helped these people, why yes, real live human beings with thoughts, dreams and emotions just like you, at all. You’ve only hurt and marginalized them further.

Your exit programs and assistance- for those who even want such things- includes arrests, jail time and criminal records, which are so helpful when trying to find a legitimate job. Your concern includes relegating these people to the shadows, after all, if you don’t see them in your little neighborhoods they don’t exist, right? Your vote has insured these people do not have the same rights and protections that you do; they do not have the same status as human beings as you do. Someone mugs you, beats you, stabs you, rapes you, well, you can go to the police and look for justice. Your no vote makes that a dream, a myth, much like the tooth fairy, for sex workers. So tonight, when a sex worker, when many sex workers, get abused, raped, beaten or robbed and have no place to go, out of fear, out of dehumanization, out of criminalization, I hope you are happy. I hope you are satisfied with yourself. Actually, I hope you have the same kind of nightmares those sex workers have, that is, if they survive. You live in fear for your neighborhoods? We live in fear for our lives, our liberty, and our pursuit of happiness. Things you people take for granted.

And whom did you listen to when making your decision to vote no? Your pastors? Your politicians? Anti-Prostitution academics? Well, pastors and politicians have wonderful records with staying away from sex workers themselves now, don’t they? Anti-Prostitution academics whore us out for their own reasons and profit from our labor. All of these people make money and build credentials off of us. My question is did you listen to any sex workers? Did you wonder, for a second, what they wanted? What they needed? What they supported? Did you ponder them for a second; do you even care about them at all? Do they even count as humans to you? Your vote says otherwise.

But trust me when I say this, you, who worry about your neighborhoods and vote no and do not care at all…somewhere, sometime, in your life, you know, will know or have known a sex worker, someone who does, or has done, what you’ve decided deserves to remain criminalized. Look around you. We’re out there, and we are no less human or deserving of legal rights than you are.

But also know this: Even all the way out here in that generally red state, I still want to believe. I want to think that maybe one day people will see sex workers of all kinds as people too. We’ll also continue to fight for that, if we have to make you see us as such, then so be it. This fight isn’t over yet.

So, those of you who voted no? Know that. You may not see us when you don't want to, but we do exist, and we're not done with this yet. Not by a long shot.

Sincerely-
Renegade Evolution

28 comments:

LiaStarLight said...

Ren, beautifully written. Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful.

You are a beautiful, wonderful, amazing woman and I wish that all the people who discount the voices of sex workers could know you.

Renegade Evolution said...

I'm a bitter caustic cynic...but I am also stubborn as a bull and never made lower than an A in English...

;)

Aspasia said...

Dittoing my comment from your BnG post: *claps* And may I add, those who voted no on prop K yet voted for Obama being particularly hypocritical because isn’t his election supposedly symbolic for recognizing the equality of all people? Hmmm.

Bitter caustic cynic...yeah, that's the official designation I've been given by those who are baffled by the fact that I'm not jumping with joy wrt Obama's election. But I won't go into that rant here. I was very disppointed with SF citizens this morning when I heard the final results.

SnowdropExplodes said...

Renegade Evolution for Prez in 4 years' time! That was a great piece of writing, and I bet it would sound fantastic as an impassioned speech.

Anonymous said...

yeah, I'm a Californian, and I'm angry/sad knowing that so many people here voted for Obama, but also for prop 8 and against prop K. It makes me really question my sense of safety and security living here, as a queer person in and out of sex work.

I just thought there were more people on our side. It's devastating. I keep reading how much America has changed, how far we've come, etc, but certain groups of people are still trampled, demonized, ignored.

I'm in LA, but I've got sex worker friends in SF, one of whom wants to get out & become a school teacher. If he ever gets arrested, he can kiss that future goodbye.

-penny

Cara said...

Excellent post, Ren.

Gaina said...

Oh dear, that put a tear in my eye..

I'm sending my readers to check this one out, pronto.

Anonymous said...

Prop K lost because it was really badly written.

Nothing personal, Ren, but most prostitution doesn't involve women your age. Johns want young girls.

If you open up a free marketplace for pimps and traffickers like Prop K did, they are going to be trucking young girls in here, not middle aged women who want to have a union negotiating their rights. That union thing is just a fantasy.

People in San Francisco are open minded, experimental and progressive. But we're not into seeing a whole industry exploiting low-income girls and convincing them to become sex workers like it's a real job. Let them grow up first and make their own decisions. And for pete's sake, don't write a law that tells cops to ignore pimps and prevents them investigating human trafficking.

That ballot measure was a mess. We're sympathetic to sex workers here, but we can also read!

jovan b. said...

great post, Ren.

Agile Cyborg said...

Unwinding centuries of extreme social conditioning from the inner spools of the collective sexual psyche will require decades.

Most of us will not be alive to see the day when sex workers are considered valid social entities.

Oddly, I don't think the path to enriched independence even starts with an enlightened understanding of sexuality.

The journey commences only when FEAR can be analyzed and interpreted into a concrete cognitive structure that supersedes simplified-to-erase-the-complexity emotion and visceral reaction across a large social spectrum.

Your article was really well put.

I do hope the transfixed minds of the controlling simple can absorb the knowledge you presented.

roykay said...

I had hopes as well. I wish it had passed. I wish such a measure would be voted for in Cleveland.

The state makes more from busting prositutes and seizing their assets than it will ever make off stopping theft or assault. If you want to know why it's illegal, follow the money to the politicians pockets.

hexy said...

You made me cry, you bitch.

I'm so sorry this didn't go through :(

belledame222 said...

Yeah, I know. :( I was glad to at least have been able to be here and vote "yes." I had thought at one point I read it had high support--guess not. Well, fight on eh. Meanwhile Prop 8 is still too close to call, and, well, signing on to everything you said to everyone who voted or campaigned for "yes" on that one. I imagine fewer w/in the feminist/progressive blogosphere than for K, but you know, in general: I fart in your general direction.

Also, too:

You know. It just wouldn't have been a proper 00's election without at least one gut-wrenching drawn out suspense tossup with lots of fighting which is ultimately probably going to turn out the wrong way anyway. We seem to have missed in the nationals, but thank goodness there's at least this, you know?

arghity argh argh argh

/sorry

nonetheless, still yeah, Obama, with all the faults and doubts and fears and cynicism and everything, it was a wondrous thing, and I was glad to be a part of it.

but yeah, I don't know, people...people.

belledame222 said...

wrt 8, yeah...the sponsors really kind of pulled out every last stop, shitloads of money, manipulation, outright lying, the Kid Card...

it sort of boggles me that--okay, lazy bigotry I get, campaigning for even hateful shit that actually benefits oneself in one measurable way I get, but =all this effort= for--what, now, exactly? No, seriously, I...will never understand this.

salzara_tirwen said...

Their murders will still be written up with the tag NHI (No Humans Involved)

Seriously literally?? What the hell ass balls?

Martin Dufresne said...

When does someone become a "sex worker", defined by her or his finction servicing males? I find that label very reductive and essentialist. A penniless youth arriving into town, a woman unable to pay the rent, vulnerable people - omen, youths and transgendered folks - pushed into occasional than permanent prostitution by poverty, pimps, early abuse, discrimination, racism and a lack of other viable options in a sexist, racist, classist system are no "sex workers" (as some claim by using that label to defend all prostitution). And to claim that the pimps, johns, brothel-owners and traffickers that bankrolled support for a Proposition K that would have gotten these exploiters off the hook are these women's youths and transgendered folks' "allies" is a pathetic sham. I am proud of San Franciscans for defeating by 31,000 votes the blank cheque that would have been given to an industry and to the males it serves up with marginalized, impoverished people to ejaculate in.
Now let's get to work at winding down the social systems that force the majority of prostituted people to sell sex to the dominant class to survive. Norway's parliamentary Justice Committee has just vetted a gov't bill that will make it illegal for Norwegian men to use their money to avail themselves of "sexual services", either at home or abroad. This - and front-line support on housing, detox, safety and income support issues - is the kind of action that will really create equality and justice in the end, once we get beyond the defeatist "it (sexual exploitation) has always existed and it will always exist" self-interested lies that some have always been putting out.

Renegade Evolution said...

Martin, Martin, Martin...

You're new here, it's obvious. There is a difference between a prostituted person and a sex worker, indeed- a distinction I draw often and make no bones about. I, along with being invovled in the sex biz, also happen to be involved in sex worker outreach and absolutely am for anyone and everyone helping those who want out of the industry out of the industry-any and all aspects of it. I spend time, money, and effort working for just that...so spare me the lecture.

Norway and Sweden both have...interesting...ideas on how to handle the sex business. Many people love the Swedish Model...the sex workers themselves are less than thrilled with it. Same goes for the prostituted people. New Zealand and The Aussies seem to have far more realistic models in place...ones that would probably work here wonderfully.

You also seem to assume (like a lot of people) that no one is in the sex industry by choice...hummm. Either way, how does keeping prostitutes saddled with the title "criminal" and keeping them afraid to go to the police help them at all?

Explain that, please.

hexy said...

(I have no idea how to do a trackback)

Martin:

When does someone become a "sex worker",

When they decide that's how they wish to define themselves. As sex workers around the world, at all levels of socioeconomic privilege and disadvantage, have done.

I find that label very reductive and essentialist

Good thing it has nothing to do with you, then. We find it useful and accurate, and we're the ones who matter when it comes to deciding how we're labelled.

Renegade Evolution said...

Hexy- Indeed. I love how people continually feel as if they get to define us for us, regardless of what we have to say about it.

hexy said...

I'm beginning to lose what minimal patience I had for it to begin with. It's such blatant minimising of our authority over our own lives.

Anonymous said...

You’re a real piece of work, Renegade. I look at the blog header and I see an attractive, healthy, well-maintained white woman who apparently makes good money stripping and doing pornography. You do it by choice, fine. You do rough content by choice because that is what you like. Fine. I don’t know if you escort or pro-dom or whatever else, but what ever you do, you command a pretty hefty rate I’d imagine. Couple of hundred per hour for a strip show? More for porn? Getting choked and slapped and pounded up the ass pays well for you, and by your own words, you enjoy it.

But I bet not everyone can afford you, Renegade. So johns then go out and find women who are poorer than you, more desperate than you, more helpless than you and do it to them. They don’t care if they’re into it or not, and those women don’t make a couple hundred or more per hour. Your job and freely made turns you on content is someone else’s hell, and decrim won’t change that.

Ernest Greene said...

Hey anonymous gutless troll,

You hate sex work and want to call it something else, fine. That's your business. You want to advocate punishing women for engaging in it. That's your business to.

You want to bring your hateful shit over here to explain to all us delusional and/or selfish fools why arresting sex workers is somehow good for them?

You've picked the perfect place to display your ignorance. We can really appreciate it. It's ever so familiar. We've heard the same lies told over and over, and the personal attacks, well, that's a familiar style too.

I'm not surprised you won't sign in. You've got plenty to say so long as you don't have to put your name to it.

Now that you've ejaculated your hatred all over everybody, why don't you just troll on out of here? Nobody's buying what you're trying to sell in this neighborhood.

belledame222 said...

Nony, you asshole: no, it'll -change criminalizing the actual women who get exploited right now,- you stupid, stupid, -stupid- fuck.

hexy said...

Yeah! What Nonny said! Coz nothing helps out a poor, desperate, helpless woman forced to charge incredibly low rates for her sexual services like getting arrested and landed with a criminal record! Hell, some of them even get landed with fines that force them to stay in the sex industry even if they would otherwise have been able to get out! And that's way better than your stupid proposition to stop police arresting them for hooking!

... wait, what?

Aspasia said...

After reading Anonymous' statement, I realize a STRONG need for Babelfish to have an Idiot to English translator.

Brian said...

Some people can only focus on the sex part of sex work and not actually acknowledge the work part. They also seem to project themselves into the situation and since they would never or could never imagine doing this kid of work, then they conclude that no one else really wants to do it either. They can't fathom the parallels to any other type of job, where there are some who choose to stay in it and enjoy aspects of it while others tolerate it as temp job choice, a last resort option. I can't imagine being involved in ultimate fighting as a job, but that doesn't mean I can't discount those who stay in it because they enjoy much of it. I know it's been said before, but for many people sex is something that can't be bartered or sold, it seems to mean only one thing to them, while the rest of us realize it is a complex part of life and can carry different meanings at different times with different people and be a means to self-discovery in countless ways, not always found in a monogamous, church and society-approved relationship.

Daisy said...

Trackback:

On Proposition 8, the Mormons, and more...

Iamcuriousblue said...

It looks like everybody's favorite prostitution "researcher" just got an editorial in Newsweek. --Gag--