Okay then, TpoP and MN:I shall begin with the TpoP viewing at Augsburg College in Minneapolis, MN.
Now, some of you knew I was going to MN for some reason. Some of you knew I was going to MN and for what reason. The fact of it all is a few months back, Plain(s)Feminist was contacted by Prof. Jensen and asked if the women’s studies program (and others) wanted to host a viewing of TpoP on campus. The answer was yes, but she wanted a view from the other side to also be present. Guess who came to mind? So, arrangements were made. Now, I decided it was best, considering what happened with the whole William and Mary debacle, to keep things quiet. It seemed that was a good idea. In any event, the event happened on Friday the 21st.
So, I arrived at the conference room on campus and was aware of two things immediately: As always, I was the shortest person in the room, and two, I was over dressed. The East Coast proclivity to look somewhat like Neo in winter- what, with the black trench coats and boots and all was a bit much in rather mellow but damn is it cold MN. That’s okay. I rather liked my outfit; it made me a feel a bit like a gunslinger. Prior to the viewing, introductions were made, and for the most part everyone was very nice, but I noted right off the bat that Prof. Jensen did not seem at all pleased that I was there. PF introduced me to him, I smiled, he did not, he tersely shook my hand, said “Hi”, then completely turned his attention elsewhere to initiate a different conversation with PF (who is awesome and totally worth initiating conversation with, yet still, I found this very rude). There was a journalism student there who wanted to interview me, so I went someplace quieter to speak with him for a few, then it was time to get things underway. The order of events was gone over: Jensen would introduce the film, we’d watch it, I’d make a statement after the film, then Q&A time.So Jensen introduced the film, being careful to say it was not his movie, but he also stated that the makers of the film were not affiliated with the Feminist Anti-Porn Movement*, he talked a brief bit about Feminist criticism of porn, his experiences in studying porn, how if during the film anyone who was uncomfortable or upset could look away or leave, then we watched the film (edited version). Early on it the viewing there were some giggles and laughs out of people watching, but by the time it was over, everyone was silent. When the film was over, I made my statement, which (damn camera) I hoped I’d be able to just let you listen to, but alas…so I will be paraphrasing.
I informed the viewers that they had just received a crash course in Gonzo and BDSM porn, but contrary to what the film claimed it was (which it does claim, in bold white print on a black screen), it is not indicative of the top selling and renting films of 2005- in fact there is not footage from a single Feature film in TpoP at all, and the top renting/selling porn film of 2005 (and all time), “Pirates” is not even mentioned. Nor, in any of the BDSM porn shown, is there a single female dominant featured, which within the genera of BDSM porn is a very, very popular theme. I also mentioned the way the interviews were set up and presented- very brief commentary from people involved in porn amid some of the roughest content they had filmed or content taken not from porn films at all-but rather from web sites versus lengthy humanizing statements from non-porn /anti-porn people was somewhat slanted, as was mixing drawings from torture manuals in with BDSM footage as no one who has ever been actually tortured as a political prisoner or whatnot signed on, consented and got paid to do it. I also mentioned that many people engage in sexual acts such as BDSM play consentingly in their bedrooms…and you know, there were a fair amount of people sitting there in the audience nodding when I said that.
Jensen rebutted this saying the footage they used was pulled from the most popular thirty films of 2005. Which is untrue.**
Then Q&A began, and truthfully, to me (perhaps PF has a more neutral perspective), it seems like Jensen let me handle most of that. I answered questions on how 2257/proof of age/consent works, I was asked and answered a question about how I can do porn yet still have any sense of intimacy with my husband (the gal who asked that seem flabbergasted by my answer, which is the basic intimacy is in the head and heart, not crotch), a self ID’ed gay man asked me how what I do contributes to a society that makes men like him feel dominant over women, and I explained that those feelings go far beyond porn and right into every aspect of society, and when he did not seem satisfied with that, I reminded him that changing his feelings of dominance was not on me, it was on him, and he needed to examine that rather than looking to lay blame (I suggested he buy and read Jensen’s book, to which Bob nodded and said yes, do buy his book). I talked about how porn is crap sex ed and people need to demand more quality sex ed, and how focusing on porn, when there is far more sexualized violence in mainstream media and movies seems strange to me, as one is far more widespread and available to minors than the other…
And, oh yes, as no one was carded at the event, I did ask if everyone in the room was over 18, explained that what they had just seen was actual porn, and pornographers such as John Stagliano were currently embroiled in court cases because of the possibility that minors could access his pornography on the net.
There was brief talk of feminist porn and egalitarian porn and could such things exist and what would they look like. I said yes, they could, and would probably be more representative of female centric pleasure and diverse body types…yet, hey, some females do actually like BDSM, there was talk of "barely legal" porn, at which point I had to state people who are way over legal get cast in barely legal, and a woman over 18 in a cheerleader outfit is still a woman over 18 and 2257 assures that. Bob talked about how porn, as viewed through a feminist lense, contributed on with sexism and violence in society, yet he did admit there are no real studies that suggest porn causes rape. I mentioned that porn, contrary to what the film stated, is less violent than it was several years ago- and both the government and the industry itself are regulating content- facts made evident by the recent Max Hardcore case and Extreme Porn Law in the UK, as well as the rise once again in the production of feature films by the mainstream porn industry…features which do not contain acts like bukkake and ATM. I also stated that I did not think I would be changing the minds of anyone who already had made their minds up, but I think it is important to hear both sides of any issue, and things such as bestiality porn, “granny” porn, virtual kiddy porn, and other more extreme elements shown in TpoP are not things made by the mainstream porn industry…or even most of the porn industry in general, even if this movie would have you think otherwise, and I hoped people would keep that in mind and not just buy everything they were told when it came to porn, or the people in it.
We were running out of time at this point, so Jensen made his final statement which included a quick statement about how many porn performers had been sexually abused (I let this pass…time was almost up) and how porn had to be looked at against the larger context of Patriarchy. My last statement was to thank him and everyone else for coming and to remember the first amendment was not a suggestion.
Now, real quick, two things I noted:
One, in this discussion, Jensen identified himself as a heterosexual male…I have heard he has ID’ed as gay male elsewhere, but I have no proof of this, does anyone else? If it is true, it does draw his credibility into question.
Two: And this did bother me a bit…with the exception of perhaps twice, even while engaging me, Jensen refused to look me in the eye. I have a thing about that- in when one is speaking to someone, or asking them something, or responding to something they’ve said, it is good form, polite, and general human nature to look them in the eye, and he seemed unwilling to do that. Shoot, anyone I talked to there, even people hostile to me or my stance, I looked them in the eye, it just seems like both the civilized and natural thing to do, and contrary to popular belief, I can be both.
But I do have to say, I was really happy to see that I seemed to get more nods of agreement from people and such when I was speaking, and some viewers from another local college asked me if I would be willing to come speak there, and afterwards a young woman thanked me for standing up for women who engage in BDSM, because she and her partner (also a woman) are into BDSM and feel often demonized for it.
Oddly enough, the subject of 2257 was quickly dispatched and not dwelled upon by Jensen or myself…I wonder why? Humm.
I then finished my interview with the student journalist, then myself, my student host and some other students from the school went out for pizza. Mighty good pizza too!
Now then, onto Minneapolis itself:Cleanest city I have ever been in. You could eat off the sidewalk in Minneapolis. The one bit of graffiti I saw was of Snoopy. The people are all very, very polite, and damn is it cold. COLD. I mean, I have been in cold places before in winter: Chicago, Denver, New York, Philly, shoot, it even gets cold here, but not like it does in Minnesota! Yikes!
The Holiday Inn I stayed in was really nice, but I did have to laugh- The Iowa Hawkeyes were playing the MN Golden Gophers- last time in the 'Dome, and the hotel had become a small part of Iowa for the weekend. Hawkeye Hotel! I happen to like football though, so this was really fun for me, to watch all these crazy Hawk fans getting geared up for the game and all…which they won. Prior to all that madness though, PF stopped by and we hung out and talked for a short bit. Very nice lady with, oh, perfect skin and a very engaging way about her. The Augsburg student (whose name I won’t mention, privacy and all) who hosted me was also a really nice gal, as were the post-viewing pizza group…and yep, despite the FREEZING factor, I had a really good time and would recommend Minneapolis to anyone who doesn’t mind cold weather. I can see why the Vikings play inside…and I think I’ve come home with the accent. It’s contagious.
And as much as I hate air travel…MN has a nice airport. Very nice.Oh, and even though they lost the big game…I did get a MN memento from a college football fan---
* Dr. Sun is linked with the Feminist Anti-Porn Movement and has spoken at Feminist Anti-Porn Events such as Stop Porn Culture.
**A great deal of the footage used was taken from internet sites such as kink.com and extreme gonzo lines like those made by JM Productions, yet not a single scene from a feature was used, though the highest grossing films such as Pirates & Island Fever 2 are features, or films from Vivid, which is a leader in the porn industry.

52 comments:
All hail the conquering hero's return! *grins*
Sounds like a really well-organised event, and I'd guess you've planted some seeds there that will grow, and that you've helped other people concentrate their own doubts into something more concrete.
And I think it's just great that people there got to see a porn performer as, like, a human being (human enough to have pizza with! Yay, pizza!)
Oh yeah, and that outfit is totally cool.
The God Emperor of Rome was pleased with the event.
I think you did those students a great service by providing the balance that's so sorely lacking in TPoP. I'm sure you've given them a lot to think about.
It's a shame that the other people who watch it may not receive any alternative view.
Sounds like it went well, and good for you for hopefully planting some seeds there.
This morning, I was looking at my only pair of pants, black ones like the ones in your picture, and was debating getting a vest. If I look half as gunslinger-y as you do in one, I'm buying it.
I'm glad you enjoyed MPLS and that the event went "well". Not only porn but also many other important issues never have both sides presented or represented. Good job, air travel does blow, and think its cold now come back in January :)
Those are some nice clothes. :)
It's weird that he doesn't want to look at you. Perhaps it's the only way he can keep from succumbing to the influence. He probably needed a cold shower badly and that's why he couldn't join you for pizza...
Eli
Becca- The outfit is even more gun-slinger-ish WITH the jacket on, but I was inside and all ;)
Hey, congrats! It sounds like you were fantastic and certainly far more diplomatic and engaging than he even attempted to be. And good on you for not letting him get by with so many of the falsehoods. Ugh...
As for Jensen, I know little about him beyond what I've learned from you, but as for this part:
"One, in this discussion, Jensen identified himself as a heterosexual male…I have heard he has ID’ed as gay male elsewhere, but I have no proof of this, does anyone else? If it is true, it does draw his credibility into question."
I would say no. His ideas are asinine enough as it is, and I think it could make you vulnerable to charges of homophobia/taking the low road, etc. You still get inflammatory and untrue charges thrown at you sometimes as it is, but they have no real basis in fact (in my opinion, anyway. I mean, yeah, people get angry on their own blogs, but you were nothing but diplomatic on those radio broadcasts that I heard you do with Jill.). Also, I don't see how his stated sexual orientation has anything to do with the arugments he's making. I would just tackle the arguments on, well, their own terms, since you're doing such a great job of debunking them in the first place. I mean, it sounds like you pretty soundly won that debate.
In any case, I mostly just don't see how speculation about his sexual orientation is really going to help you.
K: The only reason it would be valid is because he never (or rarely) discusses gay male porn or offers critical opinion on it, even though it is just as rough as het porn...and I don't know, but i sort of feel like as a straight girl, I shouldn't be saying jack about what lesbians can want in their porn, and perhaps lesbians could not say about what I wanted in my straight girl porn? would it be that different for straight/gay men?
it also would make him, ahem, a liar. His sexual orientation matters not in the least, but lying does.
I read somewhere that he was gay, but I can't remember where or anything.
Re: not looking you in the eye/not wanting to engage - that's what he does over and over though isn't it. He's happy speaking FOR sex workers, but not interested in hearing them. You experienced it right there, in the flesh.
Sounds like you did a great job, and that outfit is very lovely!
So, TpoP shows clips of the BDSM stuff from kink.com, so I'm sure they show the interviews at the end where the model and the Dominant talk with the director (who is off-camera) about how much fun they had. Right? I mean, it's not like they have an agenda or -- oh, right oops. They do.
Totally off-topic, but the clothes reminded me: Are you familiar with the tabletop RPG Deadlands?
becca- nope
Ren--Yeah, that makes more sense now. I didn't realize he only focused on porn with women.
As far as him being a liar... I just meant that you already know enough about him to thoroughly discredit him. And it really could just be something innocent like... I don't know, maybe his sexual orientation has been fairly fluid? Even if it's not, he could easily level that charge at you and make you look bad at a time when (after that talk) you have the upper had as far as all of this goes. I dunno... In any case, I haven't heard anything, but I see why you'd notice it, yeah.
Hehe, sounds like you DID come back with those earrings! :D
Sounds like you did a wonderful job; thanks for representing.
Bob Jensen taught my Journalism 301 class. Back then (1996) I was a newbie stripper with no idea of his impending anti-porn fame. Which is for the best, because I might have tried to give him a nonconsensual lapdance or something out of anger. Anyhow, it makes me a little happy that UT denied him tenure.
My favorite part of the Minneapolis Airport? Bike cops riding around the terminals.
Sounds like you did us very well, Emperor Nero.
On the subject of Bob the Guilttripper's personal sexual orientation: Not that it matters much on the general topic of his lies and sex hate, but Jensen has tended to modify his public sexual orientation based upon his targeted audience. For most audiences, he calls himself hetero; yet when he wants to specifically smear gay men for their sexual habits that he opposes, then he calls himself gay or bisexual. For instance, he contributed to an academic anthology on gay male porn (mostly on how gay men should oppose it as promoting licentuousness and disease and to promote monogamy and sexual "intimacy"), where he refered himself as "sexually homeless":
[...] I am gay, except when I am straight. Call me bisexual if I like, although that is not how I identify myself. My sexual self-description is feel straight when I am with a woman and I feel gay when I am with a man. And during periods of celibacy, I bounce between the too.
Also, there is this essay that Jensen posted to his own website where he lectures gay men on their evil sexual desires and how Dworkinite-style radical feminism can "liberate" them from supposedly "hot sex" in favor of more "intimacy". In that essay, Jensen doesn't state his own personal sexuality, but does attempt to respond to an openly gay man who questioned his ideology.
So, as to everything else Jensen writes about sexuality, he changes the pitch to suit the audience.
And of course, he would act so rudely towards you; he never likes it when someone gives him a fair fight and kicks his ass. Intellectually, that is.
Anthony
AK: Nero? You know I'm afraid of fire, right?
Susan; The cops were on scooters yesterday, those little automatic stand up ones, it was pretty cool.
SWEET! I damn near came when you told me the post was up! :)
Was the Holiday Inn you stayed at the one on the U of MN campus? Across the street from my favorite college-years Chinese restaurant, the Village Wok? Yeah, it can get a little chilly in MN. But you saw the nice parts of Minneapolis. Believe me, I can take you to some places up there where Snoopy isn't the graffiti! :P
I KNEW Jensen was going to be an ass toward you. I have a problem with people avoiding my eyes during a conversation too, it's just rude. Didn't his mama teach him any manners?!
aspasia; holiday inn metradome on washington south...sorta between a few campuses it seems.
Ooh, okay. It is definitely at a nexus of campuses and not too far away from my old sorority house. Ah, memories!
Hi Ren-
Sounds like you did really well, and I’m sure Jensen read some of your work before actually having to speak with you. I love your stuff, but you are pretty mean and have been really critical of him specifically. So he was probably prepared for or expecting the fire and porn brimstone Ren, and not your more professional gunslinger self.
I also think a lot of these anti porn people do not know what to do when confronted with actual people, especially women ones, who do not want, need, or desire their help and redemption, or smart ones who do all their homework like you have. People who end up facing people like you are not getting the 70’s cartoon of the sleazy porn director or the overused stereotype of the meth head bimbo performer, so they have to hate that. I also know you are really engaging and funny and do well speaking publicly when the mood is right and you have the charisma thing going which is always an advantage to you, and I think a nasty surprise to people who expect you to be all surly, swearing, misanthropic and fat off the flesh of unsuspecting radical feminists.
Oh, and straight girl or not, you so just increased your butch girl fashion creds with that outfit. Maybe next time you go up north, you should get a coat like Joe's.
Congratulations on a job well-done. I wish there were a video so we could all see it. You might check with the event organizers to see if they made one for themselves and would share it with you.
I am a bit sorry more wasn't made of the 2257 issue, though I can see reasons why it might not be.
Also wonder if you got to question him about the use of performers' work without their consent and in some cases over their publicly stated objections.
And shifty Bob has never once looked either me or Nina in the eye, even when offering a "friendly" greeting. Makes me wonder what he's afraid we'll see there.
Thanks to Anthony for digging up the same quote about Jensen's sexual orientation that I was going to post for you.
I agree that bringing that up in a debate does open you to accusations of homophobia, but those accusations are obviously false and the two relevant points are:
1) The kind of porn he talks about is het-specific and there is a realistic probability that, like a straight man forcing himself to watch gay porn, he might be bringing unconscious bias to his analysis as a result. It's not an ad hominem attack. It's a reasonable question;
2) His failure to make this disclosure to largely het audiences, and to claim the opposite about himself in front of those audiences, does indeed make him a liar who seeks to demonstrate his credibility in discussing a subject to which he brings experience that might bear on his expertise. If he simply said nothing about his own orientation, I'd let it lie, but when he goes out of his way to mislead listeners about it, that invites calling out.
Imagine, if you will, what the audience reaction would be to a self-identified straight man talking to a largely gay audience about gay porn would be.
He put the issue of his own sexuality on the table, which makes it fair game.
All in all, it sounds like you did us proud, which does not surprise me at all.
Congratulations.
Ernest-
Oh, 2257 and lack of performer consent/objection was discussed, in smaller groups and with the school journalist, but not in the post film discussion- we had a very set time limit, but trust me, that message was given to anyone and everyone who chose to speak with me afterwards.
Also, I totally want to steal "intimacy is in the head and heart, not crotch" can I?
Eli.
I will evenutally post about this at my place, but I just wanted to add that I thought the whole thing went really well, and that I've been hearing positive things from students and faculty who were there, as well as from Ren and Bob (both of whom had really compelling things to say). So, I'm pleased, and I think everyone in the audience left with a lot to think about.
I won't get into the interpersonal stuff except to say that I think people sometimes identify their sexuality differently at different times and in different contexts, and I don't know the case here, but having had other people challenge my sexual identity tends to make me want to give folks a lot of room to identify as they feel moved to do so. For what it's worth.
I do think that Ren may have gotten most of the questions, which doesn't surprise me - how often do students get to ask an actual sex worker questions like this?! She also had to follow a film with some intentionally disturbing (for many of us) scenes with a defense of the industry, which put her in a defensive position to begin with, and she handled that beautifully.
We actually have a lunch next month at which we will continue to discuss these issues - everyone on campus seems very interested in and stirred up about all that was discussed, so there is lots of continuing discussion. I'm really grateful, Ren, that you were part of this - I think yours and Bob's presentations worked really well together. You were a fabulous addition to the program!
Waistcoat hotness!
It sounds like you did well, and gave the audience a measured and thoughtful presentation. I'm glad it went OK!
Thanks very much for going, commenting and blogging. I was looking forward to this post. Video would be nice, but wordsmitthing is great too.
Excellent post, Ren! Makes me wish I'd been there. It sounds like you'd be a great lecturer.
Wow...I can't believe you did it Ren! You were actually in the same room at Jensen and didn't strangle him! :P
Sounds like it went really well, but i did also notice Jensen has a hard time looking people in the eye if they disagree with him. He usually stares at the ground when someone present an opposing viewpoint.
How many times did he mention Andrea Dworkin?
Bob sez:
The end is nigh
He really is more Calvinist than communist, isn't he?
Ooh, one more thing that some of us were talking about afterward - Bob is really a Marxist, and Ren is really a capitalist, and I think that those two economic positions go a long way to explain some of their differences in this.
PF: True, I do forget Bob is a marxist and I...yeah...am not. And I realize marxism does influence views on everything, esp. in regards to labor (which for an evil capitalist, I am pretty into workers rights)...i think in a lot of ways he and i are sooo differently wired: politically, on issues of objectification and morality, views on human nature, so on, we are pretty much exact opposites.
Quoting Plain(s)feminist:
Ooh, one more thing that some of us were talking about afterward - Bob is really a Marxist, and Ren is really a capitalist, and I think that those two economic positions go a long way to explain some of their differences in this.
Being a man of the Left and pretty close to a Marxist myself, PF, I beg respectfully to differ with you on that one.
Bob Jensen may spout Marxist-like verbiage and steal Marxist-like terms to promote his pet theories, but he is about as Marxist as I am a right-wing libertarian. He does NOT believe in the basic concept of redistributing wealth and resources according to need..and that alone would place him outside the realm of a legit Marxist.
Also, a genuine Marxist would not waste his/her time with side issues such as how men masturbating to images of naked women (and men) directly lead to the maldistribution of power and wealth...(s)he would see that as a distraction from the real battle of "the class struggle" between labor and the poor (the "working class") and those with the power ("the ruling class").
Most legit socialists and Marxists that I know would not be so stupid as to deny individual people's experiences or to disrespect a person's choices within the larger perspective of capitalism; they simply believe that changing the system would enhance and improve individual freedom AND collective humanity equally.
And likewise, there are capitalists who are as fundamentally dense when it comes to respecting individual choice as pseudo-Leftists like Jensen are.
So...it's not really a Left-Right or Capitalist-Socialist issue regarding Bob the Guilttripper; it's his own personal myopias squaring off against reality.
Just my opinion, of course.
Anthony
Awesome job Ren. I'm so glad you finally got to face him and have your say.
I've no doubt he's been having dreams of sugarplum gunslingers dancing in his head ever since...
XX
I really don't think Bob identifying as a Marxist has anything to do with it. If anything, Marxism is antithetical to his little crusade. I also don't see Ren identifying as a capitalist as having much to do with the idea that women are individual human beings who can make their own decisions.
Ren,
Sounds like things went swimmingly--great job!
I have to agree with some of the other commenters: Jensen does seem a bit fluid in his self-identification as straight/bi/gay/whatevs, but then so do a LOT of us--myself included.
More importantly, though, where is the proof that women who work in the porn industry have been abused? Everyone keeps speaking of it as if it were fact, but I can't find _any_ empirical studies done on the subject. Only anecdotal surveys seem to exist. If you could point me to one--one that either proves or disproves the porn stars as sexually abused wrecks myth--I'd be grateful.
-MJ
Feminasty
http://thefeminasty.blogspot.com
ms. jackson-
see, that's the problem, to the best of my knowledge...NO SUCH STUDY exists for women in porn, or even the full scope of the sex industry. Some people like to take questionable research and stats done by Farley on a select number of prostitutes in SF and use...everything...she said for the whole of the sex industry- but an actual study on women in porn- from the gals in San Fernando to the women on the net doing cam shows?
So far as I know- Never Been Done.
And I have zero problem with fluid sexualities, but when you claim het to some crowds and gay to others, it seems strange to me.
ms. J- Just took a gander at your blog...be wary of 2257.
Responding to Ms. J:
More importantly, though, where is the proof that women who work in the porn industry have been abused? Everyone keeps speaking of it as if it were fact, but I can't find _any_ empirical studies done on the subject. Only anecdotal surveys seem to exist. If you could point me to one--one that either proves or disproves the porn stars as sexually abused wrecks myth--I'd be grateful.
I'm not sure that there have been any empirical studies done on "feminist porn" other that aren't really "push polls" slanted towards antiporn ideology....but there have been several anthologies and other forms of documentaries done in support of that particular genre.
There is the work of Constance Penley, who teaches Media Studies and Film at UC-Santa Barbara and who wrote an entire anthology (Pornotopia) on the growth and development of the industry.
And ,there is the documentary called Hot and Bothered, which was produced by Becky Goldberg, that featured exactly that genre.
Finally, I would think that a Google search involving Nina Hartley or Candida Royalle would yield some fruitful results as well.
Anthony
Ren--thanks for the info on the (lack of) availability of studies. That's what I thought, since I'm a librarian and I still can't seem to find any info. Also, re: the 2257--I'm doing the best I can to be sure that I only link to and promote material that has a clearly identified 2257 notice, but I _have_ been wrestling with the issue of linking to stuff on free sites at all, given your insightful comments about 2257 that I've read here and elsewhere. Thanks for the heads up.
Anthony--I'm actually looking for info on the industry as a whole, since most people I talk to about sex workers' rights seem to agree that feminist porn isn't the issue with regard to abuse. They're under the impression that the mainstream industry "preys on" abuse victims. Any leads you might have on the industry as a whole would be awesome. Also, thanks for the heads up on the Penley anthology.
-MJ
Feminasty
http://thefeminasty.blogspot.com
Ren, you did an amazing job! I knew that Jensen likes to play games with how he identifies himself sexually, but this is the first I've heard where he identified himself as straight to an audience that he assumed was het as well.
A Marxist is someone who identifies the class struggle as the major engine of historical change. The Dworkinites are sternly opposed to that philosophy and substitute gender for class.
Jensen does use leftist jargon in order to confuse people into thinking he's some sort of progressive. Dworkin did this also - less so by her rhetoric and more by her manner of dress. But Jensen never talks about alternatives to capitalism, just as he never discusses alternative sexual imagery to current pornography. He's all negativity, doom and gloom.
I don't know if Jensen identifies as Marxist, though he is clearly anti-capitalist, but that could mean a lot of things.
The essay he wrote on capitalism a while back showed a clear lack of systematic understanding of capitalism, and was more a moral critique than anything. That shows, at best, more of an affinity to Christian socialism than Marxism. That's putting it charitably – really I think he's just trying to be more politically correct than thou, and anti-capitalism is just part of the laundry list.
Ren, I'm so glad you made that trip. I wish we could put together a national tour for you and Jensen to screen and discuss TPoP on college campuses. There is such a need and it sounds like you did a fantastic job (no surprise there, of course).
Re the discussion in the thread here: I agree with Amber that Jensen's Marxism could just as likely bring him to a position where he supports sex workers while challenging the capitalist ownership of media. In fact there is where my own more socialist leanings bring me.
I also think that the fluidity of his sexuality is a nonissue, but I wish that he would present his sexuality that way when he discusses it at all. It would help advance our understanding of sexuality if more of us with fluid sexualities identified that way instead of opting back for the rigid binaries that constrain us. (Not the primary point here of course, and I don't intend to derail the more important conversation which is the discussion of TPoP :) )
Elizabeth:
I really would love to do this more often...I actually seem to be pretty good at it.
Anthony,
I'll be honest - I'm not as up on Marxism as I should be, so I'll take your word for it. I got this analysis of his position vis a vis Ren was what some of the faculty (most of whom weren't there, though) were discussing, and I thought it was kind of an interesting idea.
Ren,
Yes, you are very good at this kind of thing and should do it more often!
First, weather.
Minnesota is fucking frigid. As a former resident of 4 years there. Damn,,, And november is still relatively mild. Although the polyester wool blend flight attendant dress was nice and cool on cold days in case the -15 before wind chill on the 7th level employee parking at MSP airport wasn't enough to give an authentic Minnesota feel.
People are very friendly and down to earth there although way too heavy on the letter "O" giving one a sense that the movie Fargo didn't go far enough in portraying the Minnesota accent.
now on to thoughts
Part 2,
Jensen,
Ren of course Jensen wouldn't make eye contact and only offer a terse "hi".
1. He is a world expert and authority in pornography. As a straight or perhaps not straight male he knows far more about the world of violence against women then say,,,, a mere female. And of course he knows far more about pornography and it's effects then say,,,, a mere sex worker not to mention a female one. Please try to remember he is the expert and knows everything. As a female sex worker the most you can achieve in his female nirvana is to understand that you are part of an oppressed class and years of feminist support and nurturing may help you get a mere inkling of all he already knows.
2. He is a feminist and you aren't. Thus he has studied and memorized the holy nuggets to the point of being able to understand them like an English major remembers Shakespeare. Fie Fie, unknit that threatening unkind brow, dart not scornful glances from those eyes,,,,,,,,
3. You are at best an annoying distraction at worst a brainwashed doltish trollup that assists a global partriachal culture in subjugating and enslaving 3.3 billion women collecting huge checks for your role as shill for Flynt and Hefner. How dare you interrupt his homily when he could share the stage with an actual qualified "womyn" such as Farley or a survivor that knows her place.
Remember this is about equality for women and freedom for sex workers and from his perspective the best method to achieve those is you are silent, invisible, invalidated and understanding your oppression by telling the world your story from his perspective.
Now, how to get there. Of course, what you needed was to be arrested and given the choice of jail or a nice diversionary sentence where you can be unemployed, shamed, re-educated and pay for the privilege. Please try to remember your place in the world feminism....
You can be free and the path to that is a nice feminist ball gag and chains with the mantra if you have to talk keep your mouth shut.
Sounds like you more than held your own and called Bob on the lack of rigor in his analysis.
I'm with AK and others in not being sure the political differences explain the difference in your and Bob's POVs. Most people separate human rights and economic issues -- I think capitalist POVs (which don't exclude workers' rights) coincide with a progressive view of human rights about as often as they don't, and marxist POVs don't as often as they do.
"I'm with AK and others in not being sure the political differences explain the difference in your and Bob's POVs. Most people separate human rights and economic issues -- I think capitalist POVs (which don't exclude workers' rights) coincide with a progressive view of human rights about as often as they don't, and marxist POVs don't as often as they do."
Agreed – just like there's libertarian and not-so-libertarian capitalism, there actually is a such thing as libertarian Marxism (Castoriadis, the Situationists, etc), even if the super-authoritarian varieties are better-known. There are even a few contemporary Marxist groups, like the Workers' Liberty group in the UK, that are pretty strong on sex workers rights and freedom of expression.
And looking back at the "Feminist Sex Wars" of the 70s and 80s, a number of socialist feminists were among the first to challenge the radical feminist consensus about the evils of sex work, porn, etc.
Sheldon,
"A Marxist is someone who identifies the class struggle as the major engine of historical change. The Dworkinites are sternly opposed to that philosophy and substitute gender for class."
Yes this, and thank you for a most important and succinct clarification. The damage done to both leftism and feminism by the neo-con orthodoxy of radfems has come close to destroying both.
Neither will be able to exert a constructive influence on society until the mad contradictions of self-styled radical feminists are addressed directly, exposed for the sham they are and kicked to the curb by the otherwise legitimate movements around the throats of which they've wrapped their boney hooks.
Post a Comment